PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLO vs. ET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VLO vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLO achieves a 60.63% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VLO has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 22.25%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 13.14% annualized return.


VLO

1D
1.20%
1M
6.47%
YTD
60.63%
6M
55.37%
1Y
98.72%
3Y*
35.62%
5Y*
30.28%
10Y*
22.25%

ET

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
19.85%
6M
19.34%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLO vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
60.63%36.97%-2.96%5.86%74.95%40.25%-35.69%30.27%-15.73%38.66%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
19.85%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%42.96%-44.92%5.88%-17.74%-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VLO and ET is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006

0.38

The correlation between VLO and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VLO:

$77.08B

ET:

$65.93B

EPS

VLO:

$13.77

ET:

$1.36

PE Ratio

VLO:

18.79

ET:

14.01

PS Ratio

VLO:

0.63

ET:

0.76

PB Ratio

VLO:

2.86

ET:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

VLO:

$126.17B

ET:

$89.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VLO:

$12.45B

ET:

$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

VLO:

$9.02B

ET:

$13.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLO vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLO
VLO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLO vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLOETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.13

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.00

1.22

+5.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.41

2.70

+14.71

VLO vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLO and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLO vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLO drawdown since its inception was -87.50%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLO and ET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLOETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.50%

-87.81%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.19%

-9.38%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.22%

-24.56%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.22%

-25.82%

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.88%

-72.82%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-6.47%

+5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-25.72%

-8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

4.65%

+1.04%

Volatility

VLO vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.08%. This indicates that VLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLOETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.80%

5.08%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.42%

12.03%

+15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.83%

16.13%

+18.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.92%

24.86%

+12.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.36%

34.99%

+5.37%

Dividends

VLO vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

VLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.00%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
1.80%2.78%3.49%3.14%3.09%5.22%6.93%3.84%4.27%2.34%3.51%2.40%

Financials

VLO vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Valero Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
32.38B
27.77B
(VLO) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VLO vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Valero Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
23.9%
Portfolio components
VLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.20B and revenue of 32.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

VLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 1.73B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

VLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VLO and ET have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLO has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to ET (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLO dropped -87.50% vs ET's -87.81%.

VLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLO and ET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer