VFH vs. VYM
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VFH returned 12.20%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFH charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VFH vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VFH having a 12.20% annualized return and VYM not far behind at 11.90%.
VFH
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
VFH vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -6.40% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and VYM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VFH and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFH vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFH
VYM
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFH
VYM
Technology
VFH
VYM
Real Estate
VFH
VYM
Industrials
VFH
VYM
Healthcare
VFH
VYM
Communication Services
VFH
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VFH
VYM
Basic Materials
VFH
-
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VFH
-
VYM
Energy
VFH
-
VYM
Utilities
VFH
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
VYM
VFH vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFH | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.46 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.93 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | 14.76 | -14.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFH | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 2.56 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.83 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.73 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
VFH vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -56.98% | -21.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -6.69% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -14.46% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -15.84% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | -35.21% | -9.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.24% | -0.43% | -8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -7.19% | -11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 1.78% | +3.77% |
Volatility
VFH vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 2.77% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 7.67% | +3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 10.28% | +4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 13.96% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 16.34% | +6.20% |
VFH vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFH vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.56% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and VYM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.20% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VFH.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.
VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VFH and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFH and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer