PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VFH having a 12.20% annualized return and VYM not far behind at 11.90%.


VFH

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
12.20%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-6.40%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and VYM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.86

The correlation between VFH and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFH vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
VYM

Financial Services

96.8%
20.5%

Technology

2.1%
17.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.0%

Industrials

0.2%
12.1%

Healthcare

0.1%
12.2%

Communication Services

0.0%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
6.7%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Energy

-

9.8%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
VYM
20.5%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
VYM
17.7%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
VYM
0.0%

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
VYM
12.1%

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
VYM
12.2%

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
VYM
6.7%

Basic Materials

VFH

-

VYM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

VYM
8.1%

Energy

VFH

-

VYM
9.8%

Utilities

VFH

-

VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFHVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.46

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

3.93

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

14.76

-14.33

VFH vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFHVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.56

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.83

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.73

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.51

-0.27

Drawdowns

VFH vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-56.98%

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-6.69%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-14.46%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-15.84%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-35.21%

-9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.24%

-0.43%

-8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-7.19%

-11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

1.78%

+3.77%

Volatility

VFH vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

2.77%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

7.67%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

10.28%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

13.96%

+5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

16.34%

+6.20%

VFH vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFH vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.56%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFH and VYM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFH has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.20% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VFH.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.

VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VFH and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer