PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.35%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


VFH

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
12.35%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-5.08%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.80

The correlation between VFH and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFH vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
VOO

Financial Services

96.8%
11.6%

Technology

2.1%
35.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Industrials

0.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

0.1%
8.5%

Communication Services

0.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
VOO
11.6%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
VOO
35.7%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
VOO
1.9%

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
VOO
8.3%

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
VOO
10.2%

Basic Materials

VFH

-

VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

VFH

-

VOO
3.5%

Utilities

VFH

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFHVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.29

2.53

-2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

3.43

-2.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.46

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

3.42

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.79

15.95

-15.16

VFH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFHVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

2.53

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.85

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.87

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.89

-0.65

Drawdowns

VFH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-33.99%

-44.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-8.90%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-18.69%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-24.52%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-33.99%

-10.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

0.00%

-7.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-3.69%

-14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

1.91%

+3.61%

Volatility

VFH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that VFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.74%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

8.88%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

11.78%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

16.81%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

18.01%

+4.53%

VFH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.54%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFH and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFH has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 12.35% for VFH. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VFH.

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VFH and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer