PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VFH vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


VFHXLF
YTD Return24.36%25.45%
1Y Return41.15%40.33%
3Y Return (Ann)6.68%7.26%
5Y Return (Ann)11.58%11.84%
10Y Return (Ann)11.17%13.66%
Sharpe Ratio3.533.63
Sortino Ratio4.614.75
Omega Ratio1.611.62
Calmar Ratio2.672.73
Martin Ratio23.0723.79
Ulcer Index2.04%1.91%
Daily Std Dev13.31%12.56%
Max Drawdown-78.61%-82.43%
Current Drawdown-2.47%-2.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between VFH and XLF is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

VFH vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFH having a 24.36% return and XLF slightly higher at 25.45%. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 11.17%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


200.00%220.00%240.00%260.00%280.00%300.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
254.02%
296.12%
VFH
XLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFH vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%
Expense ratio chart for VFH: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VFH vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VFH, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VFH, currently valued at 4.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VFH, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VFH, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VFH, currently valued at 23.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0023.07
XLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.63, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 4.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 23.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0023.79

VFH vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is comparable to the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.53
3.63
VFH
XLF

Dividends

VFH vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.73%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%1.85%1.82%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%

Drawdowns

VFH vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.47%
-2.06%
VFH
XLF

Volatility

VFH vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.35%
4.18%
VFH
XLF