PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VFH vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and XLF is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

VFH vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
18.84%
17.34%
VFH
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VFH:

2.14

XLF:

2.28

Sortino Ratio

VFH:

3.08

XLF:

3.26

Omega Ratio

VFH:

1.40

XLF:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

VFH:

4.29

XLF:

4.43

Martin Ratio

VFH:

14.03

XLF:

14.71

Ulcer Index

VFH:

2.29%

XLF:

2.17%

Daily Std Dev

VFH:

15.02%

XLF:

14.09%

Max Drawdown

VFH:

-78.61%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

VFH:

-5.70%

XLF:

-5.29%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFH having a 30.76% return and XLF slightly higher at 30.80%. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 11.33%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.


VFH

YTD

30.76%

1M

-4.63%

6M

18.83%

1Y

31.71%

5Y*

11.74%

10Y*

11.33%

XLF

YTD

30.80%

1M

-4.15%

6M

17.34%

1Y

31.71%

5Y*

11.76%

10Y*

13.68%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFH vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%
Expense ratio chart for VFH: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VFH vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VFH, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.142.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for VFH, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.083.26
The chart of Omega ratio for VFH, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.401.42
The chart of Calmar ratio for VFH, currently valued at 4.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.294.43
The chart of Martin ratio for VFH, currently valued at 14.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.0314.71
VFH
XLF

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.14
2.28
VFH
XLF

Dividends

VFH vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%1.85%1.82%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%

Drawdowns

VFH vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.70%
-5.29%
VFH
XLF

Volatility

VFH vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 4.27%. This indicates that VFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.64%
4.27%
VFH
XLF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab