PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.46%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.96% annualized return.


VFH

1D
0.54%
1M
3.75%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
13.46%

VGT

1D
0.39%
1M
4.11%
YTD
28.03%
6M
26.85%
1Y
54.06%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
25.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-0.69%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
28.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and VGT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between VFH and VGT has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VFH vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
VGT

Financial Services

96.8%
0.5%

Technology

2.1%
98.5%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%
0.4%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
VGT
98.5%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
VGT

-

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
VGT
0.4%

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
VGT
0.1%

Basic Materials

VFH

-

VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

VGT

-

Energy

VFH

-

VGT
0.3%

Utilities

VFH

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFHVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.40

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

3.31

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

10.16

-8.42

VFH vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFH vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-54.63%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-16.40%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-27.23%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-35.07%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-35.07%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-4.18%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-7.95%

-10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

5.34%

+0.33%

Volatility

VFH vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.19%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

10.66%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

18.19%

-6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

22.44%

-7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

25.50%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

24.78%

-2.22%

VFH vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFH and VGT have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFH vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.47%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.32%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFH and VGT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to VFH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.96% vs 13.46% for VFH. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.96% return vs 13.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH and VGT have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.

VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer