PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. IYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. IYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's -4.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VFH having a 12.35% annualized return and IYF not far ahead at 12.69%.


VFH

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
12.35%

IYF

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-4.11%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-5.08%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
-4.11%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and IYF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.98

The correlation between VFH and IYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFH vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
IYF

Financial Services

96.8%
99.0%

Technology

2.1%
0.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.7%

Industrials

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
IYF
99.0%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
IYF
0.3%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
IYF
0.7%

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
IYF

-

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
IYF

-

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
IYF

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
IYF

-

Basic Materials

VFH

-

IYF

-

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

IYF

-

Energy

VFH

-

IYF

-

Utilities

VFH

-

IYF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFHIYFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.29

0.52

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

0.79

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.10

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.55

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.79

1.53

-0.74

VFH vs. IYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the IYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and IYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFHIYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

0.52

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.52

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.22

+0.02

Drawdowns

VFH vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and IYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHIYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-79.09%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-13.88%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-16.60%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-25.06%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-42.57%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-7.05%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-17.61%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

5.03%

+0.49%

Volatility

VFH vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 3.12%, while iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHIYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.32%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

10.77%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

14.29%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

18.99%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

20.89%

+1.65%

VFH vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IYF's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFH vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, which matches IYF's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.55%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.54%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VFH and IYF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IYF has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to VFH (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs IYF's -79.09%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 12.69% vs 12.35% for VFH. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.

VFH and IYF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.54%.

VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VFH and 0.42% for IYF.

IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and IYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer