VFH vs. VUG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG).

VFH and VUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VFH is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. VUG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2000. Both VFH and VUG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VFH vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VFH vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	-9.19%	14.91%	30.44%	14.17%	-12.31%	35.22%	-1.96%	31.57%	-13.52%	19.99%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	-9.39%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFH having a -9.19% return and VUG slightly lower at -9.39%. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.30%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.16% annualized return.

VFH

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -3.54%
• YTD: -9.19%
• 6M: -6.32%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

VUG

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: -9.39%
• 6M: -8.17%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 16.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

VFH

Vanguard Financials ETF

VUG

Vanguard Growth ETF

Return for Risk

VFH vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH

VFH Risk / Return Rank: 15
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 16

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 44
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFH	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	0.82	-0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	1.32	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.19	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	1.19	-1.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.54	4.15	-3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFH vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFH	VUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	0.82	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.53	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.76	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.57	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and VUG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VFH vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than VUG's 0.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	1.61%	1.55%	1.75%	2.08%	2.31%	1.87%	2.21%	2.17%	2.30%	1.53%	1.63%	2.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.45%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Drawdowns

VFH vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFH	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.61%	-50.68%	-27.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-16.53%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-35.61%	+9.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.42%	-35.61%	-8.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.95%	-12.25%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.62%	-7.13%	-11.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	4.72%	+0.27%

Volatility

VFH vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.85%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFH	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	7.12%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	12.70%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.93%	22.70%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.37%	22.22%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.55%	21.38%	+1.17%