PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 9.92%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


VEA

1D
-0.67%
1M
-4.26%
6M
7.02%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
9.92%
ALL TIME*
5.03%

FDIS

1D
-0.77%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-3.89%
YTD
-0.90%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
13.25%
ALL TIME*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
11.59%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.90%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and FDIS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.70

The correlation between VEA and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
FDIS

Financial Services

23.1%
0.1%

Technology

18.4%
1.0%

Industrials

17.9%
1.1%

Healthcare

7.9%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
96.2%

Basic Materials

6.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
1.2%

Energy

4.5%

-

Communication Services

3.2%
0.3%

Utilities

3.1%

-

Real Estate

2.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

VEA
23.1%
FDIS
0.1%

Technology

VEA
18.4%
FDIS
1.0%

Industrials

VEA
17.9%
FDIS
1.1%

Healthcare

VEA
7.9%
FDIS
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.3%
FDIS
96.2%

Basic Materials

VEA
6.9%
FDIS

-

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.3%
FDIS
1.2%

Energy

VEA
4.5%
FDIS

-

Communication Services

VEA
3.2%
FDIS
0.3%

Utilities

VEA
3.1%
FDIS

-

Real Estate

VEA
2.5%
FDIS
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.07

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

0.37

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

1.10

+7.25

VEA vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-39.16%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-15.50%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-27.43%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-39.16%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-39.16%

+3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-5.45%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-7.47%

-5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

5.20%

-2.11%

Volatility

VEA vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.26%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

14.02%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

18.87%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

24.01%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

22.33%

-5.15%

VEA vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FDIS's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.74%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and FDIS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to FDIS (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.25% vs 9.92% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FDIS.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.74% for FDIS.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.08% for FDIS.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer