PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEA having a 14.92% return and SCHF slightly higher at 15.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.17% annualized return and SCHF not far ahead at 10.27%.


VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%

SCHF

1D
-0.86%
1M
5.91%
YTD
15.56%
6M
18.62%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and SCHF is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.99

The correlation between VEA and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
SCHF

Financial Services

23.3%
20.6%

Industrials

19.2%
11.5%

Technology

13.8%
15.7%

Healthcare

8.2%
6.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
4.9%

Energy

5.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.3%

Utilities

3.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.7%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
SCHF
20.6%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
SCHF
11.5%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
SCHF
15.7%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
SCHF
6.5%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
SCHF
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
SCHF
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
SCHF
4.9%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
SCHF
5.0%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
SCHF
2.3%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
SCHF
1.7%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
SCHF
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEASCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.86

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

11.11

-0.17

VEA vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEASCHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.09

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.60

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.44

-0.19

Drawdowns

VEA vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEASCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-34.87%

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-11.48%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-13.41%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-29.14%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-34.87%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.86%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-7.38%

-5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.95%

+0.03%

Volatility

VEA vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEASCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

5.66%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

13.34%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

15.74%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.39%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.18%

+0.18%

VEA vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VEA and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.27% vs 10.17% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer