UXRP vs. NOBL
UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UXRP charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
UXRP vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -73.83% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 5.77% return.
UXRP
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -31.36%
- YTD
- -73.83%
- 6M
- -75.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
UXRP vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -73.83% | -77.43% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 5.77% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXRP and NOBL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXRP vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
UXRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NOBL
UXRP vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXRP | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXRP vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.02%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXRP | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.02% | -35.43% | -60.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.85% | -3.94% | -91.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.44% | -3.48% | -68.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility
UXRP vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXRP | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.99% | 11.53% | +137.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.99% | 14.38% | +134.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.99% | 16.63% | +132.36% |
UXRP vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXRP vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than NOBL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXRP and NOBL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while NOBL is Dividend. UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.35% for NOBL.
Find the right allocation for UXRP and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer