UXRP vs. NOBL
UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UXRP returned -94.69% vs 15.41% for NOBL. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UXRP charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
UXRP vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -77.99% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 10.84% return.
UXRP
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -74.16%
- YTD
- -77.99%
- 1Y
- -94.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -94.38%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.40M | $66.46M | $60.79M | |
| $852.19K | $746.96K | $1.32M |
UXRP vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -77.99% | -77.43% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 10.84% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXRP and NOBL is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXRP vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
UXRP
NOBL
UXRP vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXRP | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.21 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 1.62 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 4.10 | -5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXRP vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.60%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXRP | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.60% | -35.43% | -61.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.74% | -9.11% | -86.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.51% | -2.31% | -94.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.97% | -3.46% | -71.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 76.79% | 3.59% | +73.20% |
Volatility
UXRP vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a higher volatility of 24.70% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 5.07%. This indicates that UXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXRP | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.70% | 5.07% | +19.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.23% | 9.11% | +92.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 142.99% | 11.92% | +131.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.51% | 14.48% | +129.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.51% | 16.63% | +126.88% |
UXRP vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXRP vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXRP and NOBL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXRP has higher volatility (24.70%) compared to NOBL (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXRP dropped -96.60% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 15.41% vs -94.69% for UXRP. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 15.41% return vs -94.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while NOBL is Dividend. UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXRP and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer