UXRP vs. BEGS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) and BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) are both Leveraged Cryptocurrency funds. UXRP is passively managed, while BEGS is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UXRP charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEGS.

Performance

UXRP vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -77.44% return, which is significantly lower than BEGS's -42.99% return.

UXRP

• 1D: -7.94%
• 1M: -14.92%
• 6M: -81.67%
• YTD: -77.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEGS

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: -9.53%
• 6M: -49.98%
• YTD: -42.99%
• 1Y: -40.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXRP vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF	-77.44%	-77.43%
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-42.99%	4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between UXRP and BEGS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

UXRP vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 4
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXRP vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UXRP	BEGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.56	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.93	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.36	—

Drawdowns

UXRP vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.60%, which is greater than BEGS's maximum drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and BEGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXRP	BEGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.60%	-60.23%	-36.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-60.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.42%	-57.76%	-38.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.78%	-19.40%	-54.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UXRP	BEGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	56.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.39%	67.23%	+79.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.39%	63.68%	+82.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.39%	63.68%	+82.71%

UXRP vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXRP vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison

UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BEGS's 84.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	84.60%	48.23%
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF	0.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXRP and BEGS in my portfolio?

UXRP and BEGS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UXRP or BEGS?

On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXRP or BEGS?

BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXRP or BEGS?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 84.60%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.

What is the main difference between UXRP and BEGS?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Rareview. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.99% for BEGS.