PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USD vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 103.32% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 61.24%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.


USD

1D
-4.99%
1M
31.62%
YTD
103.32%
6M
97.79%
1Y
250.81%
3Y*
125.78%
5Y*
67.80%
10Y*
61.24%

NOBL

1D
1.06%
1M
1.10%
YTD
4.61%
6M
4.84%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USD vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
103.32%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%81.72%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.61%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between USD and NOBL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

0.46

The correlation between USD and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USD vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USD
NOBL

Financial Services

27.8%
12.4%

Technology

27.4%
3.6%

Energy

0.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Industrials

-

20.3%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Financial Services

USD
27.8%
NOBL
12.4%

Technology

USD
27.4%
NOBL
3.6%

Energy

USD
0.0%
NOBL
3.4%

Basic Materials

USD

-

NOBL
10.9%

Communication Services

USD

-

NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

USD

-

NOBL
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

USD

-

NOBL
23.5%

Healthcare

USD

-

NOBL
9.7%

Industrials

USD

-

NOBL
20.3%

Real Estate

USD

-

NOBL
4.6%

Utilities

USD

-

NOBL
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USD vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.16

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.94

1.15

+6.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.96

2.98

+19.98

USD vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USD Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USD and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

0.92

+3.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.37

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.58

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.65

-0.16

Drawdowns

USD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-35.43%

-53.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.80%

-9.11%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.46%

-15.36%

-49.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.85%

-17.92%

-59.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.85%

-35.43%

-42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-4.99%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.35%

-3.48%

-28.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.98%

3.51%

+7.47%

Volatility

USD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 21.29% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.40%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.29%

2.40%

+18.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.74%

8.05%

+38.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.28%

11.37%

+49.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.56%

14.39%

+62.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.24%

16.60%

+52.64%

USD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than NOBL's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.10%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.23%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


USD and NOBL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to NOBL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, USD leads with 61.24% vs 9.58% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 61.24% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.23% for USD.

USD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 0.35% for NOBL.

USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USD and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer