USD vs. SMH
USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USD returned 62.35%/yr vs 37.55%/yr for SMH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. USD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
USD vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 116.46% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 75.55% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed SMH with an annualized return of 62.35%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively lower 37.55% annualized return.
USD
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- 45.27%
- YTD
- 116.46%
- 6M
- 113.25%
- 1Y
- 300.04%
- 3Y*
- 128.54%
- 5Y*
- 71.52%
- 10Y*
- 62.35%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
USD vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 116.46% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between USD and SMH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.96 |
The correlation between USD and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
USD vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USD
SMH
Financial Services
-
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
USD
SMH
-
Technology
USD
SMH
Energy
USD
SMH
-
Basic Materials
USD
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
USD
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
USD
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
USD
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
USD
-
SMH
-
Industrials
USD
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
USD
-
SMH
-
Utilities
USD
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USD vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
USD
SMH
USD vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.94 | 5.29 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.98 | 5.29 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.73 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.93 | 11.02 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.78 | 42.34 | -13.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.94 | 5.29 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.14 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.34 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
USD vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -84.96% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.80% | -14.93% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.46% | -35.74% | -28.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.85% | -45.30% | -32.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.85% | -45.30% | -32.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.36% | -41.09% | +8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 3.89% | +7.08% |
Volatility
USD vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 20.29% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.59%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.29% | 11.59% | +8.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.37% | 24.29% | +22.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.29% | 30.57% | +30.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.56% | 35.02% | +41.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.24% | 32.58% | +36.66% |
USD vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
USD vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.21% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USD and SMH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to SMH (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 62.35% vs 37.55% for SMH. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 62.35% return vs 37.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.
USD has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
USD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 4.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USD and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer