UGE vs. NOBL
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGE returned 8.70%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for NOBL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
UGE vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, UGE has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 8.70%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.
UGE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- 12.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
UGE vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 15.44% | -5.21% | 16.40% | 2.38% | -46.78% | 42.44% | 56.64% | 58.28% | -30.14% | 32.38% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.93% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and NOBL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.69 |
The correlation between UGE and NOBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
UGE vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UGE
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
UGE
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
UGE
NOBL
Basic Materials
UGE
-
NOBL
Communication Services
UGE
-
NOBL
-
Energy
UGE
-
NOBL
Financial Services
UGE
-
NOBL
Healthcare
UGE
-
NOBL
Industrials
UGE
-
NOBL
Real Estate
UGE
-
NOBL
Technology
UGE
-
NOBL
Utilities
UGE
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
NOBL
UGE vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.37 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 3.47 | -3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGE vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -35.43% | -35.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -9.11% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | -15.36% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -17.92% | -38.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -35.43% | -21.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.78% | -2.89% | -31.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -3.48% | -15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.88% | 3.59% | +7.29% |
Volatility
UGE vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that UGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 3.31% | +7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 8.22% | +12.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.98% | 11.47% | +14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 14.38% | +17.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 16.60% | +16.52% |
UGE vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGE vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than NOBL's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.11% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and NOBL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGE has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 10.02% vs 8.70% for UGE. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 2.05% for NOBL.
UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGE and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer