UGE vs. NOBL
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGE returned 7.82%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
UGE vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, UGE has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 7.82%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.
UGE
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- -3.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
UGE vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 9.62% | -5.21% | 16.40% | 2.38% | -46.78% | 42.44% | 56.64% | 58.28% | -30.14% | 32.38% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.51% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and NOBL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.69 |
The correlation between UGE and NOBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
UGE vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UGE
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
UGE
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
UGE
NOBL
Basic Materials
UGE
-
NOBL
Communication Services
UGE
-
NOBL
-
Energy
UGE
-
NOBL
Financial Services
UGE
-
NOBL
Healthcare
UGE
-
NOBL
Industrials
UGE
-
NOBL
Real Estate
UGE
-
NOBL
Technology
UGE
-
NOBL
Utilities
UGE
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
NOBL
UGE vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.14 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.99 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 2.58 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 0.80 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.35 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.57 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.64 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
UGE vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -35.43% | -35.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -9.11% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | -15.36% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -17.92% | -38.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -35.43% | -21.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.07% | -5.99% | -32.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.73% | -3.48% | -15.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 3.50% | +6.97% |
Volatility
UGE vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that UGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 2.36% | +5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 8.00% | +11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 11.33% | +13.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.31% | 14.38% | +16.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 16.60% | +16.48% |
UGE vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGE vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.22% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and NOBL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGE has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs 7.82% for UGE. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.
UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGE and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer