UDIV vs. NVDU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. UDIV is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, UDIV returned 28.77% vs 51.92% for NVDU. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UDIV charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.

Performance

UDIV vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than NVDU's 2.08% return.

UDIV

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 23.16%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

NVDU

• 1D: -8.71%
• 1M: -16.05%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 51.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	12.46%	19.00%	25.61%	7.90%
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	2.08%	33.65%	289.29%	12.08%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and NVDU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023	0.61

The correlation between UDIV and NVDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDIV vs. NVDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UDIV	NVDU
Technology	40.3%	100.0%
Financial Services	11.3%	-
Communication Services	10.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	-
Healthcare	7.1%	-
Industrials	5.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Real Estate	3.6%	-
Energy	3.3%	-
Utilities	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

UDIV vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV

UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 75
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 80

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 24
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UDIV	NVDU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	0.74	+1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	1.40	+1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.17	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	1.23	+2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.00	2.70	+12.30

UDIV vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and NVDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	UDIV	NVDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-67.27%	+32.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-42.27%	+33.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-30.48%	+27.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-18.91%	+14.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	19.30%	-17.38%

Volatility

UDIV vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) is 4.96%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 26.33%. This indicates that UDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UDIV	NVDU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	26.33%	-21.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	53.28%	-43.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	70.48%	-57.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	91.03%	-75.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.30%	91.03%	-74.73%

UDIV vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

UDIV vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than NVDU's 5.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	5.68%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	1.12%	1.53%	2.05%	1.91%	3.20%	2.97%	2.90%	3.40%	3.74%	3.47%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UDIV and NVDU in my portfolio?

UDIV and NVDU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UDIV or NVDU?

NVDU has higher volatility (26.33%) compared to UDIV (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

Which ETF is better, UDIV or NVDU?

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 51.92% vs 28.77% for UDIV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, UDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UDIV or NVDU?

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 51.92% return vs 28.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UDIV or NVDU?

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for NVDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UDIV or NVDU?

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.12% for UDIV.

What is the main difference between UDIV and NVDU?

UDIV is categorized as Dividend, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 1.04% for NVDU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.