PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 22.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UDIV having a 11.54% annualized return and RDIV not far behind at 11.30%.


UDIV

1D
0.91%
1M
0.58%
6M
11.30%
YTD
13.87%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
11.74%

RDIV

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.60%
6M
17.44%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
11.30%
ALL TIME*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.34M$2.84M$4.35M
$516.03K$427.19K$922.08K

UDIV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
13.87%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
22.74%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and RDIV is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between UDIV and RDIV has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UDIV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDIV
RDIV

Technology

40.3%
5.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
19.2%

Communication Services

10.1%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
14.5%

Healthcare

7.7%
6.8%

Industrials

6.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
15.4%

Real Estate

3.7%
7.6%

Energy

3.3%
17.0%

Utilities

2.7%
6.4%

Basic Materials

0.7%
0.5%

Technology

UDIV
40.3%
RDIV
5.1%

Financial Services

UDIV
11.4%
RDIV
19.2%

Communication Services

UDIV
10.1%
RDIV
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UDIV
8.9%
RDIV
14.5%

Healthcare

UDIV
7.7%
RDIV
6.8%

Industrials

UDIV
6.0%
RDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

UDIV
5.4%
RDIV
15.4%

Real Estate

UDIV
3.7%
RDIV
7.6%

Energy

UDIV
3.3%
RDIV
17.0%

Utilities

UDIV
2.7%
RDIV
6.4%

Basic Materials

UDIV
0.7%
RDIV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UDIV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDIVRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

7.24

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

22.00

-10.41

UDIV vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-49.97%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-4.84%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-17.91%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-24.89%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-49.97%

+14.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.46%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-5.80%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.59%

+0.46%

Volatility

UDIV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) have volatilities of 3.90% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.00%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

9.25%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

13.49%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

17.41%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

21.85%

-5.68%

UDIV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDIV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than RDIV's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.45%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.48%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDIV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to UDIV (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 10-year performance, UDIV leads with 11.54% vs 11.30% for RDIV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, UDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.48% for UDIV.

UDIV is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer