UAN vs. LXU
UAN (CVR Partners, LP) and LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — UAN in Agricultural Inputs, LXU in Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, UAN returned 12.50%/yr vs 2.08%/yr for LXU. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAN vs. LXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 23.13% return, which is significantly lower than LXU's 50.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has outperformed LXU with an annualized return of 12.50%, while LXU has yielded a comparatively lower 2.08% annualized return.
UAN
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- 23.13%
- 6M
- 32.73%
- 1Y
- 65.98%
- 3Y*
- 27.14%
- 5Y*
- 32.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
LXU
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- 50.71%
- 6M
- 33.30%
- 1Y
- 63.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
UAN vs. LXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAN CVR Partners, LP | 23.13% | 54.09% | 27.18% | -13.80% | 43.68% | 452.88% | -48.32% | 1.48% | 3.66% | -45.19% |
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 50.71% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -30.00% | 20.36% | 323.75% | -19.29% | -23.91% | -36.99% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAN and LXU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2011 | 0.33 |
The correlation between UAN and LXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UAN:
$11.49
LXU:
$0.85
UAN:
10.59
LXU:
15.06
UAN:
0.19
LXU:
0.04
UAN:
2.00
LXU:
1.08
UAN:
$643.22M
LXU:
$641.26M
UAN:
$133.57M
LXU:
$125.71M
UAN:
$266.31M
LXU:
$142.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAN vs. LXU — Risk / Return Rank
UAN
LXU
UAN vs. LXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAN | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 2.49 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 6.47 | +4.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAN | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.17 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.32 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.03 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.05 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
UAN vs. LXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, roughly equal to the maximum LXU drawdown of -97.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and LXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAN | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.77% | -97.83% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.77% | -25.71% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.52% | -56.08% | +27.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -81.38% | +32.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.85% | -93.22% | +0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.54% | -65.26% | +55.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.60% | -56.23% | +8.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 9.89% | -3.94% |
Volatility
UAN vs. LXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) is 11.72%, while LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) has a volatility of 17.60%. This indicates that UAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAN | LXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.72% | 17.60% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.53% | 41.45% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.34% | 54.99% | -14.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.60% | 62.44% | -19.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.74% | 73.76% | -19.02% |
Dividends
UAN vs. LXU - Dividend Comparison
UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, while LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAN CVR Partners, LP | 10.09% | 11.63% | 8.81% | 40.64% | 19.21% | 5.62% | 0.00% | 12.90% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 11.81% | 15.61% |
Financials
UAN vs. LXU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVR Partners, LP and LSB Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UAN vs. LXU - Profitability Comparison
UAN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 38.03M and revenue of 180.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
LXU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.79M and revenue of 169.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
UAN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported an operating income of 57.65M and revenue of 180.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.
LXU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.16M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
UAN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a net income of 49.91M and revenue of 180.05M, resulting in a net margin of 27.7%.
LXU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 19.69M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UAN and LXU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LXU has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to UAN (11.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAN dropped -96.77% vs LXU's -97.83%.
UAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAN and LXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer