UAN vs. LXU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU).

Performance

UAN vs. LXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UAN vs. LXU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UAN CVR Partners, LP	21.36%	54.09%	27.18%	-13.80%	43.68%	452.88%	-48.32%	1.48%	3.66%	-45.19%
LXU LSB Industries, Inc.	75.76%	11.99%	-18.47%	-30.00%	20.36%	323.75%	-19.29%	-23.91%	-36.99%	4.04%

Fundamentals

EPS UAN : $9.33 LXU : $0.51
PE Ratio UAN : 13.28 LXU : 29.07
PEG Ratio UAN : 0.23 LXU : 0.08
PS Ratio UAN : 2.16 LXU : 1.16
Total Revenue (TTM) UAN : $606.04M LXU : $615.21M
Gross Profit (TTM) UAN : $56.63M LXU : $104.30M
EBITDA (TTM) UAN : $226.53M LXU : $121.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly lower than LXU's 75.76% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has outperformed LXU with an annualized return of 14.34%, while LXU has yielded a comparatively lower 4.13% annualized return.

UAN

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: 17.04%
• YTD: 21.36%
• 6M: 43.72%
• 1Y: 82.86%
• 3Y*: 28.04%
• 5Y*: 42.12%
• 10Y*: 14.34%

LXU

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 25.13%
• YTD: 75.76%
• 6M: 92.53%
• 1Y: 128.44%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 29.61%
• 10Y*: 4.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UAN vs. LXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAN

UAN Risk / Return Rank: 92
UAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
UAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
UAN Omega Ratio Rank: 93
UAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UAN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LXU

LXU Risk / Return Rank: 91
LXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LXU Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LXU Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAN vs. LXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAN	LXU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.35	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.87	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.36	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	5.26	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.31	14.69	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UAN vs. LXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the LXU Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAN and LXU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAN	LXU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.35	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.48	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.05	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.05	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between UAN and LXU is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UAN vs. LXU - Dividend Comparison

UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, while LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UAN CVR Partners, LP	8.50%	11.63%	8.81%	40.64%	19.21%	5.62%	0.00%	12.90%	0.00%	0.61%	11.81%	15.61%
LXU LSB Industries, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UAN vs. LXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, roughly equal to the maximum LXU drawdown of -97.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and LXU.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAN	LXU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.77%	-97.83%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.77%	-24.09%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.19%	-81.38%	+32.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.85%	-93.22%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.84%	-59.49%	+48.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.06%	-56.21%	+8.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	8.62%	-3.43%

Volatility

UAN vs. LXU - Volatility Comparison

CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) have volatilities of 23.05% and 23.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAN	LXU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.05%	23.32%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.69%	41.36%	-7.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.38%	55.06%	-16.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.31%	62.38%	-18.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.71%	75.79%	-21.08%

Financials

UAN vs. LXU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CVR Partners, LP and LSB Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a gross profit of -75.58M and revenue of 131.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -57.7%.

LXU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.20M and revenue of 165.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.

UAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported an operating income of -2.89M and revenue of 131.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

LXU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.68M and revenue of 165.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

UAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a net income of -10.27M and revenue of 131.06M, resulting in a net margin of -7.8%.

LXU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 16.13M and revenue of 165.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.