UAN vs. SJT
UAN (CVR Partners, LP) and SJT (San Juan Basin Royalty Trust) are both stocks. UAN operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while SJT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, UAN returned 13.23%/yr vs -1.39%/yr for SJT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAN vs. SJT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than SJT's -47.69% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has outperformed SJT with an annualized return of 13.23%, while SJT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.39% annualized return.
UAN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -12.10%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 18.01%
- 1Y
- 36.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 32.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
SJT
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -28.12%
- YTD
- -47.69%
- 6M
- -45.56%
- 1Y
- -50.17%
- 3Y*
- -23.58%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- -1.39%
UAN vs. SJT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAN CVR Partners, LP | 11.27% | 54.09% | 27.18% | -13.80% | 43.68% | 452.88% | -48.32% | 1.48% | 3.66% | -45.19% |
SJT San Juan Basin Royalty Trust | -47.69% | 46.74% | -22.92% | -50.02% | 120.63% | 163.80% | 11.80% | -45.15% | -38.19% | 39.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAN and SJT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
UAN:
$11.49
SJT:
-$0.01
UAN:
1.81
SJT:
28.16K
UAN:
$643.22M
SJT:
$3.65K
UAN:
$133.57M
SJT:
$3.65K
UAN:
$266.31M
SJT:
-$2.45K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAN vs. SJT — Risk / Return Rank
UAN
SJT
UAN vs. SJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UAN | SJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.75 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | -0.92 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | -2.45 | +7.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UAN vs. SJT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, roughly equal to the maximum SJT drawdown of -92.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and SJT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAN | SJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.77% | -92.82% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.77% | -54.56% | +35.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.52% | -62.16% | +33.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -75.77% | +26.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.74% | -81.54% | -10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.25% | -79.43% | +61.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.48% | -37.68% | -9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.93% | 20.54% | -13.61% |
Volatility
UAN vs. SJT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) is 5.22%, while San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT) has a volatility of 12.89%. This indicates that UAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAN | SJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 12.89% | -7.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.77% | 25.95% | +11.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.34% | 36.60% | +3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 48.07% | -5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 49.46% | +5.22% |
Dividends
UAN vs. SJT - Dividend Comparison
UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, while SJT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJT San Juan Basin Royalty Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 21.81% | 14.58% | 12.67% | 5.96% | 6.85% | 8.03% | 10.19% | 5.05% | 8.81% |
UAN CVR Partners, LP | 11.16% | 11.63% | 8.81% | 40.64% | 19.21% | 5.62% | 0.00% | 12.90% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 11.81% | 15.61% |
Financials
UAN vs. SJT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVR Partners, LP and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UAN and SJT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SJT has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to UAN (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAN dropped -96.77% vs SJT's -92.82%.
UAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAN and SJT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer