PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LXU vs. SMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LXU vs. SMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a 30.00% return, which is significantly higher than SMG's 11.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LXU has underperformed SMG with an annualized return of 2.50%, while SMG has yielded a comparatively higher 2.73% annualized return.


LXU

1D
-0.54%
1M
-15.26%
YTD
30.00%
6M
29.54%
1Y
33.94%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
18.26%
10Y*
2.50%

SMG

1D
1.24%
1M
7.32%
YTD
11.08%
6M
11.01%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
-16.76%
10Y*
2.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LXU vs. SMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LXU
LSB Industries, Inc.
30.00%11.99%-18.47%-30.00%20.36%323.75%-19.29%-23.91%-36.99%4.04%
SMG
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
11.08%-8.01%8.28%36.92%-68.81%-18.03%96.18%77.05%-41.00%14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LXU and SMG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1992

0.20

The correlation between LXU and SMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LXU:

$0.85

SMG:

$1.90

PE Ratio

LXU:

12.99

SMG:

33.39

PEG Ratio

LXU:

0.04

SMG:

0.23

PS Ratio

LXU:

0.93

SMG:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

LXU:

$641.26M

SMG:

$3.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LXU:

$125.71M

SMG:

$1.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

LXU:

$142.03M

SMG:

$493.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LXU vs. SMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LXU
LXU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LXU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LXU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SMG
SMG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LXU vs. SMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LXUSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.05

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.19

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

0.34

+2.53

LXU vs. SMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the SMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LXU and SMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LXU vs. SMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, which is greater than SMG's maximum drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and SMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LXUSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.83%

-83.55%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-23.85%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.08%

-47.42%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.38%

-78.41%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.40%

-83.55%

-8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.04%

-69.55%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-22.04%

-34.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.89%

13.31%

-1.42%

Volatility

LXU vs. SMG - Volatility Comparison

LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) have volatilities of 10.31% and 10.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LXUSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

10.03%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.52%

26.49%

+15.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.92%

34.25%

+20.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.00%

46.34%

+15.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.69%

40.43%

+33.26%

Dividends

LXU vs. SMG - Dividend Comparison

LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LXU
LSB Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMG
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
4.16%4.52%3.98%4.14%5.43%1.59%3.72%2.13%3.51%1.93%2.03%2.85%

Financials

LXU vs. SMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSB Industries, Inc. and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
169.49M
1.46B
(LXU) Total Revenue
(SMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LXU vs. SMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LSB Industries, Inc. and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
21.1%
41.8%
Portfolio components
LXU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.79M and revenue of 169.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

SMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 610.50M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.

LXU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.16M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

SMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 401.80M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

LXU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 19.69M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

SMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 238.60M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LXU and SMG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LXU has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to SMG (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LXU dropped -97.83% vs SMG's -83.55%.

LXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LXU and SMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer