LXU vs. NAT
LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) and NAT (Nordic American Tankers Limited) are both stocks. LXU operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials), while NAT operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LXU returned 2.56%/yr vs -0.19%/yr for NAT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LXU vs. NAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a 30.71% return, which is significantly lower than NAT's 94.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LXU has outperformed NAT with an annualized return of 2.56%, while NAT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.19% annualized return.
LXU
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -14.80%
- YTD
- 30.71%
- 6M
- 30.25%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 18.58%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
NAT
- 1D
- 6.15%
- 1M
- 19.96%
- YTD
- 94.17%
- 6M
- 95.31%
- 1Y
- 159.58%
- 3Y*
- 33.66%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- -0.19%
LXU vs. NAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 30.71% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -30.00% | 20.36% | 323.75% | -19.29% | -23.91% | -36.99% | 4.04% |
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited | 94.17% | 54.57% | -33.63% | 55.83% | 87.90% | -41.48% | -32.82% | 156.48% | -13.56% | -68.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LXU and NAT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1997 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LXU and NAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LXU:
$0.85
NAT:
$0.26
LXU:
13.06
NAT:
24.21
LXU:
0.04
NAT:
0.30
LXU:
0.94
NAT:
3.94
LXU:
$641.26M
NAT:
$334.09M
LXU:
$125.71M
NAT:
$97.31M
LXU:
$142.03M
NAT:
$132.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LXU vs. NAT — Risk / Return Rank
LXU
NAT
LXU vs. NAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LXU | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.58 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 8.70 | -7.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 27.39 | -24.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LXU vs. NAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, which is greater than NAT's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and NAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LXU | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.83% | -90.20% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.18% | -18.45% | -15.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.08% | -46.31% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.38% | -58.72% | -22.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.40% | -85.97% | -6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.87% | -31.49% | -38.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -43.99% | -12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 5.85% | +5.88% |
Volatility
LXU vs. NAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) is 10.52%, while Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that LXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LXU | NAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 13.08% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.51% | 29.44% | +12.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.03% | 37.15% | +17.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.01% | 51.28% | +10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.70% | 58.12% | +15.58% |
Dividends
LXU vs. NAT - Dividend Comparison
LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited | 9.98% | 10.47% | 16.00% | 11.67% | 3.59% | 3.55% | 15.25% | 2.03% | 8.00% | 21.54% | 16.31% | 8.88% |
Financials
LXU vs. NAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSB Industries, Inc. and Nordic American Tankers Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LXU vs. NAT - Profitability Comparison
LXU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.79M and revenue of 169.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
NAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a gross profit of 47.64M and revenue of 106.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.8%.
LXU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.16M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
NAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported an operating income of 38.36M and revenue of 106.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
LXU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 19.69M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
NAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 106.46M, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LXU and NAT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAT has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to LXU (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LXU dropped -97.83% vs NAT's -90.20%.
NAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LXU and NAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer