LXU vs. AP
LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) and AP (Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation) are both stocks. LXU operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials), while AP operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LXU returned 2.50%/yr vs -1.19%/yr for AP. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LXU vs. AP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a 30.00% return, which is significantly lower than AP's 92.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LXU has outperformed AP with an annualized return of 2.50%, while AP has yielded a comparatively lower -1.19% annualized return.
LXU
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -15.26%
- YTD
- 30.00%
- 6M
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 33.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
AP
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 92.12%
- 6M
- 140.94%
- 1Y
- 256.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- -1.19%
LXU vs. AP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 30.00% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -30.00% | 20.36% | 323.75% | -19.29% | -23.91% | -36.99% | 4.04% |
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 92.12% | 155.02% | -23.44% | 8.76% | -49.80% | -8.76% | 82.06% | -2.90% | -75.00% | -25.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LXU and AP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.17 |
The correlation between LXU and AP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LXU:
$0.85
AP:
-$3.37
LXU:
0.93
AP:
0.48
LXU:
$641.26M
AP:
$433.03M
LXU:
$125.71M
AP:
$53.11M
LXU:
$142.03M
AP:
$20.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LXU vs. AP — Risk / Return Rank
LXU
AP
LXU vs. AP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LXU | AP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 5.09 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 11.49 | -8.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LXU vs. AP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, roughly equal to the maximum AP drawdown of -98.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and AP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LXU | AP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.83% | -98.06% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.54% | -50.80% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.08% | -80.96% | +24.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.38% | -88.58% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.40% | -95.90% | +3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.04% | -73.49% | +3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -52.24% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.89% | 22.45% | -10.56% |
Volatility
LXU vs. AP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) is 10.31%, while Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a volatility of 23.81%. This indicates that LXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LXU | AP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 23.81% | -13.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.52% | 68.51% | -26.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.92% | 86.06% | -31.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.00% | 74.89% | -12.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.69% | 72.87% | +0.82% |
Dividends
LXU vs. AP - Dividend Comparison
Neither LXU nor AP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 2.69% | 7.02% |
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LXU vs. AP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSB Industries, Inc. and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LXU vs. AP - Profitability Comparison
LXU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.79M and revenue of 169.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
AP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 103.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LXU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.16M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
AP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported an operating income of 2.56M and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
LXU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 19.69M and revenue of 169.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
AP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a net income of -867.00K and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LXU and AP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AP has higher volatility (23.81%) compared to LXU (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LXU dropped -97.83% vs AP's -98.06%.
AP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LXU and AP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer