UAN vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UAN or QYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between UAN and QYLD is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UAN vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UAN:
0.47
QYLD:
1.97
UAN:
1.07
QYLD:
2.69
UAN:
1.13
QYLD:
1.48
UAN:
0.34
QYLD:
2.65
UAN:
1.29
QYLD:
14.19
UAN:
12.03%
QYLD:
1.45%
UAN:
33.18%
QYLD:
10.40%
UAN:
-96.77%
QYLD:
-24.75%
UAN:
-30.43%
QYLD:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 24.25% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 19.32% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 7.39%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.
UAN
24.25%
3.62%
2.47%
16.72%
36.28%
7.39%
QYLD
19.32%
3.00%
10.81%
19.98%
7.37%
8.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UAN vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UAN vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, less than QYLD's 11.35% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVR Partners, LP | 9.01% | 40.64% | 19.21% | 5.62% | 0.00% | 12.90% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 11.81% | 15.61% | 14.48% | 10.60% |
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.35% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UAN vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UAN vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
CVR Partners, LP (UAN) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.64%. This indicates that UAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.