UAN vs. QYLD

In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 3.35%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.46% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAN and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, less than QYLD's 13.93% yield.

The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 13.98% and 14.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.