PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UAN vs. IEP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


UANIEP
YTD Return19.25%-14.42%
1Y Return5.99%-20.00%
3Y Return (Ann)16.76%-27.80%
5Y Return (Ann)34.74%-15.42%
10Y Return (Ann)4.26%-7.86%
Sharpe Ratio0.18-0.43
Sortino Ratio0.57-0.34
Omega Ratio1.070.95
Calmar Ratio0.13-0.26
Martin Ratio0.49-1.12
Ulcer Index12.19%17.31%
Daily Std Dev33.47%44.65%
Max Drawdown-96.77%-84.21%
Current Drawdown-33.23%-67.42%

Fundamentals


UANIEP
Market Cap$760.17M$6.34B
EPS$4.97-$1.03
PEG Ratio-1.300.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$527.39M$10.06B
Gross Profit (TTM)$110.15M$3.09B
EBITDA (TTM)$166.78M$749.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between UAN and IEP is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

UAN vs. IEP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than IEP's -14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has outperformed IEP with an annualized return of 4.26%, while IEP has yielded a comparatively lower -7.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.93%
-23.73%
UAN
IEP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UAN vs. IEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UAN, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UAN, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UAN, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UAN, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UAN, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.49
IEP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IEP, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IEP, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IEP, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IEP, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IEP, currently valued at -1.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.12

UAN vs. IEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the IEP Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAN and IEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.18
-0.43
UAN
IEP

Dividends

UAN vs. IEP - Dividend Comparison

UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, less than IEP's 32.19% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UAN
CVR Partners, LP
9.39%40.64%19.21%5.62%0.00%12.90%0.00%0.61%11.81%15.61%14.48%10.60%
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
32.19%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.07%9.84%6.52%4.13%

Drawdowns

UAN vs. IEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, which is greater than IEP's maximum drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and IEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-33.23%
-67.42%
UAN
IEP

Volatility

UAN vs. IEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) is 11.07%, while Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) has a volatility of 23.79%. This indicates that UAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.07%
23.79%
UAN
IEP

Financials

UAN vs. IEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVR Partners, LP and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items