LXU vs. LAC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC).

Performance

LXU vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LXU vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LXU LSB Industries, Inc.	75.76%	11.99%	-18.47%	-7.64%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-9.40%	46.80%	-53.59%	-36.82%

Fundamentals

EPS LXU : $0.51 LAC : $0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) LXU : $615.21M LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) LXU : $104.30M LAC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) LXU : $121.96M LAC : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a 75.76% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -9.40% return.

LXU

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 25.13%
• YTD: 75.76%
• 6M: 92.53%
• 1Y: 128.44%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: 29.61%
• 10Y*: 4.13%

LAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -22.85%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -43.89%
• 1Y: 43.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LXU vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LXU

LXU Risk / Return Rank: 91
LXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LXU Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LXU Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 62
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LXU vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LXU	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	0.33	+2.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.86	+1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.22	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.26	0.73	+4.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.69	1.30	+13.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LXU vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LXU Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LXU and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LXU	LAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	0.33	+2.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	-0.31	+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between LXU and LAC is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LXU vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LXU nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LXU vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, which is greater than LAC's maximum drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LXU	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.83%	-81.83%	-16.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.09%	-63.08%	+38.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.49%	-66.30%	+6.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.21%	-63.64%	+7.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.62%	35.08%	-26.46%

Volatility

LXU vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) has a higher volatility of 23.32% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 16.21%. This indicates that LXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LXU	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.32%	16.21%	+7.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.36%	69.33%	-27.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.06%	130.24%	-75.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.38%	102.58%	-40.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.79%	102.58%	-26.79%

Financials