PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAN vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

UAN vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UAN vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UAN
CVR Partners, LP
21.36%54.09%27.18%-13.80%43.68%472.54%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
26.36%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UAN:

$1.31B

ZIM:

$3.13B

EPS

UAN:

$9.33

ZIM:

$3.98

PE Ratio

UAN:

13.28

ZIM:

6.53

PEG Ratio

UAN:

0.23

ZIM:

0.04

PS Ratio

UAN:

2.16

ZIM:

0.45

PB Ratio

UAN:

4.93

ZIM:

0.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

UAN:

$606.04M

ZIM:

$6.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UAN:

$56.63M

ZIM:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

UAN:

$226.53M

ZIM:

$2.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 26.36% return.


UAN

1D
-2.16%
1M
17.04%
YTD
21.36%
6M
43.72%
1Y
82.86%
3Y*
28.04%
5Y*
42.12%
10Y*
14.34%

ZIM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-6.95%
YTD
26.36%
6M
98.68%
1Y
84.81%
3Y*
37.15%
5Y*
32.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAN vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAN
UAN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
UAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
UAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAN vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UANZIMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

1.35

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

2.21

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

2.94

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.31

6.61

+9.70

UAN vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAN and ZIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UANZIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.35

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.49

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.80

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between UAN and ZIM is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UAN vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than ZIM's 7.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UAN
CVR Partners, LP
8.50%11.63%8.81%40.64%19.21%5.62%0.00%12.90%0.00%0.61%11.81%15.61%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
7.67%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UAN vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and ZIM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UANZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.77%

-84.68%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.77%

-32.64%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.19%

-84.68%

+35.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.84%

-8.35%

-2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.06%

-41.09%

-6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

14.50%

-9.31%

Volatility

UAN vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

CVR Partners, LP (UAN) has a higher volatility of 23.05% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 9.13%. This indicates that UAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UANZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.05%

9.13%

+13.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.69%

40.49%

-6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.38%

63.26%

-24.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.31%

67.37%

-23.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.71%

68.50%

-13.79%

Financials

UAN vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVR Partners, LP and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
131.06M
1.48B
(UAN) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UAN vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CVR Partners, LP and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
-57.7%
5.6%
Portfolio components
UAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a gross profit of -75.58M and revenue of 131.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -57.7%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.

UAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported an operating income of -2.89M and revenue of 131.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

UAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a net income of -10.27M and revenue of 131.06M, resulting in a net margin of -7.8%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.