TYG vs. ET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

TYG is an actively managed fund by Tortoise.

Performance

TYG vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TYG vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund	16.14%	8.46%	60.18%	-0.37%	24.20%	46.86%	-70.31%	1.79%	-24.74%	3.17%
ET Energy Transfer LP	17.51%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYG achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TYG has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 1.56%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.33% annualized return.

TYG

• 1D: -7.52%
• 1M: -8.18%
• YTD: 16.14%
• 6M: 13.16%
• 1Y: 18.81%
• 3Y*: 28.59%
• 5Y*: 23.81%
• 10Y*: 1.56%

ET

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 16.34%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 29.13%
• 10Y*: 20.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TYG vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYG

TYG Risk / Return Rank: 36
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 53
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYG vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TYG	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.41	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.72	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.10	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	0.60	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	1.67	+2.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TYG vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYG and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TYG	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.41	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	1.15	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.56	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.35	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between TYG and ET is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TYG vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, more than ET's 6.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund	10.69%	11.25%	7.96%	9.87%	8.94%	5.27%	10.85%	14.61%	13.17%	9.01%	8.54%	13.95%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.97%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

TYG vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYG drawdown since its inception was -95.34%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYG and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	TYG	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.34%	-87.81%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.76%	-17.33%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.08%	-25.82%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.98%	-72.82%	-22.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.75%	-3.30%	-30.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.40%	-25.95%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	6.24%	-1.79%

Volatility

TYG vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that TYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TYG	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	5.02%	+5.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.97%	11.78%	+4.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.68%	23.83%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.99%	25.47%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.27%	36.63%	+14.64%