TYG vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
TYG is an actively managed fund by Tortoise. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
TYG vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TYG vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 25.59% | 8.46% | 60.18% | -0.37% | 24.20% | 46.86% | -70.31% | 1.79% | -24.74% | 3.17% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYG achieves a 25.59% return, which is significantly higher than EMO's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TYG has underperformed EMO with an annualized return of 2.35%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
TYG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 25.59%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.98%
- 5Y*
- 25.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TYG vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYG has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TYG vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
TYG
EMO
TYG vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.91 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.28 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.07 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 3.23 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.91 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.23 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.12 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TYG and EMO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TYG vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, more than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 9.89% | 11.25% | 7.96% | 9.87% | 8.94% | 5.27% | 10.85% | 14.61% | 13.17% | 9.01% | 8.54% | 13.95% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
TYG vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYG drawdown since its inception was -95.34%, roughly equal to the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYG and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.34% | -95.06% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.76% | -18.81% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.08% | -28.59% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.98% | -93.02% | -1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.36% | -2.55% | -25.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -32.27% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 6.22% | -1.80% |
Volatility
TYG vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) at 4.63%. This indicates that TYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TYG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 4.63% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.83% | 11.12% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 21.39% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 26.78% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.23% | 41.41% | +9.82% |