PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYG vs. MLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYG vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYG achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 26.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TYG has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of -1.12%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


TYG

1D
0.16%
1M
1.30%
6M
2.29%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
21.21%
10Y*
-1.12%
ALL TIME*
4.16%

MLPX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.91%
6M
17.40%
YTD
26.75%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
26.63%
5Y*
22.92%
10Y*
12.35%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.85M$35.99M$31.05M
$5.92M$6.80M$9.17M

TYG vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.60%8.46%60.18%-0.37%24.20%46.86%-70.31%1.79%-24.74%3.17%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
26.75%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TYG and MLPX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between TYG and MLPX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYG vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TYG
TYG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TYG vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TYGMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.27

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

7.63

-5.71

TYG vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYG and MLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TYG vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYG drawdown since its inception was -95.34%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYG and MLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYGMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.34%

-70.67%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-8.18%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.08%

-16.77%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.08%

-19.72%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.98%

-64.70%

-30.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.77%

-3.27%

-32.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.46%

-16.47%

-12.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

3.49%

+2.50%

Volatility

TYG vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) is 4.06%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that TYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYGMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

5.46%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

12.52%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.40%

15.68%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

19.90%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.09%

26.14%

+24.95%

TYG vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYG has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TYG vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than MLPX's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.05%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.52%11.25%7.96%9.87%8.94%5.27%10.85%14.61%13.17%9.01%8.54%13.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYG and MLPX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to TYG (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYG dropped -95.34% vs MLPX's -70.67%.

MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYG and MLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer