PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.75%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


TUSA

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.72%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.75%

VO

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.20%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
6.54%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.05%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and VO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2004

0.66

The correlation between TUSA and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUSA vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
VO

Financial Services

31.9%
12.8%

Industrials

19.8%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
8.6%

Basic Materials

14.1%
4.2%

Utilities

7.5%
8.3%

Technology

6.1%
18.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.1%
5.4%

Healthcare

2.0%
7.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.1%

Energy

1.9%
8.5%

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
VO
12.8%

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
VO
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
VO
8.6%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
VO
4.2%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
VO
8.3%

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
VO
18.6%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
VO
4.8%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
VO
5.4%

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
VO
7.6%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
VO
3.1%

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
VO
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUSAVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

2.14

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.23

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

8.50

-0.93

TUSA vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUSAVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.45

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.50

-0.19

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-58.87%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-8.17%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-19.02%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-27.57%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-39.37%

-3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-0.45%

-4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-7.86%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.14%

+0.30%

Volatility

TUSA vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.99%. This indicates that TUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.99%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

9.21%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

12.34%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

17.59%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

18.95%

+1.19%

TUSA vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and VO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUSA has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.55% vs 10.75% for TUSA. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.03% for VO.

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer