PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.77%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.


TUSA

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.73%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
10.77%

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
6.76%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and QQQ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2004

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between TUSA and QQQ has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TUSA vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
QQQ

Financial Services

31.9%
0.2%

Industrials

19.8%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
12.3%

Basic Materials

14.1%
1.1%

Utilities

7.5%
1.4%

Technology

6.1%
53.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
7.7%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.1%

Healthcare

2.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

2.0%
15.8%

Energy

1.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
QQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
QQQ
1.4%

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
QQQ
53.8%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
QQQ
7.7%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
QQQ
0.1%

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
QQQ
4.2%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
QQQ
15.8%

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
QQQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUSAQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

2.73

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.55

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.71

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.24

14.30

-6.06

TUSA vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUSAQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.73

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.83

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.99

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.41

-0.09

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-82.97%

+26.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-11.96%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-22.77%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-35.12%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-35.12%

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

0.00%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-32.79%

+22.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.11%

-0.69%

Volatility

TUSA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) is 3.53%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that TUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

4.48%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

12.11%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

15.95%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

22.39%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

22.30%

-2.16%

TUSA vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and QQQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to TUSA (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.97% vs 10.77% for TUSA. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

TUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer