PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. PWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has outperformed PWC with an annualized return of 11.18%, while PWC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


TUSA

1D
0.31%
1M
4.00%
6M
8.67%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
11.18%
ALL TIME*
6.70%

PWC

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.91%
6M
5.45%
YTD
10.39%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$49.65K$64.59K$60.35K
$146.70K$150.71K$191.32K

TUSA vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
15.08%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
10.39%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and PWC is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2004

0.64

The correlation between TUSA and PWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUSA vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
PWC

Financial Services

26.3%
16.9%

Industrials

21.1%
14.4%

Technology

15.8%
14.2%

Basic Materials

14.1%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
5.3%

Real Estate

10.5%
5.3%

Utilities

7.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

5.3%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
7.4%

Healthcare

5.3%
10.9%

Energy

1.9%
5.8%

Financial Services

TUSA
26.3%
PWC
16.9%

Industrials

TUSA
21.1%
PWC
14.4%

Technology

TUSA
15.8%
PWC
14.2%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
PWC
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
10.5%
PWC
5.3%

Real Estate

TUSA
10.5%
PWC
5.3%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
PWC
5.3%

Communication Services

TUSA
5.3%
PWC
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
5.3%
PWC
7.4%

Healthcare

TUSA
5.3%
PWC
10.9%

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
PWC
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TUSA vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSAPWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.15

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

6.44

+2.95

TUSA vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and PWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAPWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-78.13%

+21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.45%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-15.12%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-26.58%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-39.45%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.56%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-35.96%

+26.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.15%

+0.38%

Volatility

TUSA vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAPWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.43%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

7.30%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

9.97%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

15.90%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.05%

18.73%

+1.32%

TUSA vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than PWC's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.72%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.53%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and PWC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUSA has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to PWC (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs PWC's -78.13%.

On 10-year performance, TUSA leads with 11.18% vs 9.67% for PWC. On fees, PWC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.53% for TUSA.

TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.60% for PWC.

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and PWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer