PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. MOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has outperformed MOO with an annualized return of 11.06%, while MOO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.


TUSA

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
7.13%
6M
6.12%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
11.06%

MOO

1D
-0.47%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
5.15%
6M
5.57%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
1.24%
5Y*
-1.12%
10Y*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
7.13%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
5.15%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%22.29%-6.03%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and MOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.57

The correlation between TUSA and MOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUSA vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
MOO

Financial Services

31.9%

-

Industrials

19.8%
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%

-

Basic Materials

14.1%
25.2%

Utilities

7.5%

-

Technology

6.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
37.8%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Healthcare

2.0%
15.3%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Energy

1.9%

-

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
MOO

-

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
MOO
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
MOO

-

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
MOO
25.2%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
MOO

-

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
MOO

-

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
MOO
37.8%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
MOO

-

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
MOO
15.3%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
MOO

-

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
MOO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSAMOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.09

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

0.60

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

1.66

+5.63

TUSA vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and MOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAMOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-69.53%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-11.17%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-26.83%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-39.52%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-39.52%

-2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-21.21%

+17.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-16.97%

+7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

4.01%

-1.44%

Volatility

TUSA vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAMOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.32%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

10.83%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

14.06%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.13%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

18.14%

+1.99%

TUSA vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than MOO's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.35%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and MOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOO has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to TUSA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs MOO's -69.53%.

On 10-year performance, TUSA leads with 11.06% vs 7.00% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.65% for TUSA.

TUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.55% for MOO.

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and MOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer