PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 12.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TUSA having a 11.65% annualized return and FDL not far behind at 11.24%.


TUSA

1D
0.98%
1M
1.82%
YTD
8.91%
6M
7.64%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
11.65%

FDL

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
12.82%
6M
12.61%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
8.91%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.82%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and FDL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006

0.57

Over the past year, TUSA and FDL have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

TUSA vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
FDL

Financial Services

31.9%
15.2%

Industrials

19.8%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
4.7%

Basic Materials

14.1%
0.3%

Utilities

7.5%
6.5%

Technology

6.1%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
14.4%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Healthcare

2.0%
17.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
10.6%

Energy

1.9%
25.7%

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
FDL
15.2%

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
FDL
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
FDL
4.7%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
FDL
0.3%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
FDL
6.5%

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
FDL
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
FDL
14.4%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
FDL

-

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
FDL
17.6%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
FDL
10.6%

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
FDL
25.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSAFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

5.53

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.28

12.87

-4.59

TUSA vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-65.93%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-4.27%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-12.24%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-16.46%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-41.40%

-1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-2.96%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-9.63%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.83%

+0.75%

Volatility

TUSA vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

3.39%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

8.09%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

11.55%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

14.31%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

17.10%

+3.02%

TUSA vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FDL's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
4.69%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.94%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and FDL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to TUSA (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, TUSA leads with 11.65% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.94% for TUSA.

TUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer