TUSA vs. RYJ
TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) and RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - TUSA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index while RYJ tracks the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TUSA returned 10.77%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for RYJ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUSA charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RYJ.
Performance
TUSA vs. RYJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than RYJ's 11.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TUSA having a 10.77% annualized return and RYJ not far behind at 10.38%.
TUSA
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
TUSA vs. RYJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 6.76% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 24.79% | 14.16% | 24.29% | -10.35% | 20.07% |
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 13.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSA and RYJ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.66 |
The correlation between TUSA and RYJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TUSA vs. RYJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUSA
RYJ
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
TUSA
RYJ
-
Industrials
TUSA
RYJ
Consumer Cyclical
TUSA
RYJ
Basic Materials
TUSA
RYJ
Utilities
TUSA
RYJ
Technology
TUSA
RYJ
Consumer Defensive
TUSA
RYJ
Real Estate
TUSA
RYJ
-
Healthcare
TUSA
RYJ
Communication Services
TUSA
RYJ
Energy
TUSA
RYJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSA vs. RYJ — Risk / Return Rank
TUSA
RYJ
TUSA vs. RYJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUSA | RYJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.39 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.11 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.88 | +1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | 6.46 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUSA | RYJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.39 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.48 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.34 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
TUSA vs. RYJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, smaller than the maximum RYJ drawdown of -60.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and RYJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSA | RYJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -60.74% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -10.01% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -16.90% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -24.31% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -50.20% | +7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | 0.00% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -10.27% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.92% | -0.50% |
Volatility
TUSA vs. RYJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) is 3.53%, while Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that TUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSA | RYJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 4.56% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 9.99% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 13.62% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 18.65% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 21.65% | -1.51% |
TUSA vs. RYJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RYJ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUSA vs. RYJ - Dividend Comparison
TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than RYJ's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSA and RYJ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to TUSA (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs RYJ's -60.74%.
On 10-year performance, TUSA leads with 10.77% vs 10.38% for RYJ. On fees, RYJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 10.77% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RYJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.57% for RYJ.
TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.40% for RYJ.
TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUSA and RYJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer