TOLZ vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.75%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 7.75%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.

TOLZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 13.97%
• 3Y*: 14.17%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 7.75%

NOBL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.45%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	11.31%	14.76%	11.67%	6.18%	-4.25%	20.47%	-9.46%	26.84%	-7.90%	13.28%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.51%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TOLZ and NOBL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014	0.67

The correlation between TOLZ and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOLZ	NOBL
Energy	35.4%	3.4%
Utilities	22.2%	6.4%
Real Estate	8.0%	4.6%
Industrials	5.2%	20.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	23.5%
Financial Services	2.0%	12.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	5.1%
Technology	0.4%	3.6%
Basic Materials	-	10.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	9.7%

Return for Risk

TOLZ vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLZ

TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 43
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 22
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOLZ	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	0.80	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.24	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.14	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	0.99	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.20	2.58	+5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLZ and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOLZ	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	0.80	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.35	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.57	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.64	-0.23

Drawdowns

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOLZ	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.33%	-35.43%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.18%	-9.11%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.94%	-15.36%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.85%	-17.92%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.33%	-35.43%	-3.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	-5.99%	+2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.63%	-3.48%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	3.50%	-1.79%

Volatility

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that TOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOLZ	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	2.36%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	8.00%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	11.33%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.99%	14.38%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.29%	16.60%	-0.31%

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOLZ vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.12%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	3.66%	3.99%	3.53%	3.34%	3.01%	3.28%	3.16%	2.96%	3.63%	3.30%	2.62%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOLZ and NOBL in my portfolio?

TOLZ and NOBL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOLZ or NOBL?

TOLZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, TOLZ or NOBL?

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs 7.75% for TOLZ. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOLZ or NOBL?

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOLZ or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOLZ or NOBL?

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between TOLZ and NOBL?

TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.35% for NOBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.