TOLZ vs. GII
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.93%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for GII. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GII.
Performance
TOLZ vs. GII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than GII's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed GII with an annualized return of 7.93%, while GII has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
GII
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
TOLZ vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.09% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.45% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | -6.81% | 26.32% | -10.08% | 19.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and GII is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TOLZ and GII shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TOLZ vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
GII
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
GII
Utilities
TOLZ
GII
Real Estate
TOLZ
GII
Industrials
TOLZ
GII
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
GII
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
GII
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
GII
-
Technology
TOLZ
GII
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
GII
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
GII
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
GII
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
GII
TOLZ vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | GII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.98 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 8.50 | +0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and GII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | GII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -50.98% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -5.94% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -14.31% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -20.67% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -42.84% | +3.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -3.03% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -11.49% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.08% | -0.29% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. GII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.24%, while SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | GII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.57% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 8.96% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 10.86% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 14.09% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 17.08% | -0.85% |
TOLZ vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. GII - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than GII's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.67% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.63% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and GII have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GII has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs GII's -50.98%.
On 10-year performance, GII leads with 8.70% vs 7.93% for TOLZ. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GII has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.67% for GII.
TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GII is Utilities Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.40% for GII.
GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and GII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer