PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOLZ vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOLZ vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than GII's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed GII with an annualized return of 7.93%, while GII has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.


TOLZ

1D
0.88%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
12.09%
6M
12.14%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
7.93%

GII

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
9.45%
6M
8.82%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOLZ vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
12.09%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
9.45%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TOLZ and GII is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.85

The correlation between TOLZ and GII shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOLZ vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOLZ
GII

Energy

36.0%
20.3%

Utilities

22.2%
25.9%

Real Estate

7.9%
0.1%

Industrials

5.1%
27.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Financial Services

1.9%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Technology

0.4%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

TOLZ
36.0%
GII
20.3%

Utilities

TOLZ
22.2%
GII
25.9%

Real Estate

TOLZ
7.9%
GII
0.1%

Industrials

TOLZ
5.1%
GII
27.8%

Consumer Defensive

TOLZ
4.4%
GII

-

Financial Services

TOLZ
1.9%
GII
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TOLZ
0.8%
GII

-

Technology

TOLZ
0.4%
GII
2.5%

Basic Materials

TOLZ

-

GII

-

Communication Services

TOLZ

-

GII
0.3%

Healthcare

TOLZ

-

GII

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOLZ vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLZ vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOLZGIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.98

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

8.50

+0.66

TOLZ vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLZ and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOLZ vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOLZGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-50.98%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-5.94%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.94%

-14.31%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

-20.67%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-42.84%

+3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-3.03%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-11.49%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.08%

-0.29%

Volatility

TOLZ vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.24%, while SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOLZGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

3.57%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

8.96%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.41%

10.86%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

14.09%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.08%

-0.85%

TOLZ vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOLZ vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than GII's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.67%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.63%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOLZ and GII have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GII has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, GII leads with 8.70% vs 7.93% for TOLZ. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GII has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.67% for GII.

TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GII is Utilities Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.40% for GII.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOLZ and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer