TMF vs. VUG
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -16.87%/yr vs 17.90%/yr for VUG. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. TMF charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
TMF vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of -16.87%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -1.79%
- 3Y*
- -19.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.10%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
VUG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
TMF vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.18% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.99% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and VUG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.20 |
The correlation between TMF and VUG shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
VUG
TMF vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.29 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 4.43 | -4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -50.68% | -42.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -16.53% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.31% | -22.85% | -33.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -35.61% | -53.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -35.61% | -57.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.15% | -5.56% | -86.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -7.09% | -36.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 4.79% | +7.17% |
Volatility
TMF vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.73%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 5.73% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 13.00% | +6.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 16.46% | +12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 22.30% | +24.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 21.48% | +22.44% |
TMF vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMF vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and VUG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to VUG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.90% vs -16.87% for TMF. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.90% return vs -16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer