TMF vs. FNGU

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while FNGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TMF returned -7.67% vs 11.04% for FNGU. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMF charges 1.01%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

TMF vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -11.93% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 10.29% return.

TMF

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -10.16%
• 6M: -9.78%
• YTD: -11.93%
• 1Y: -7.67%
• 3Y*: -21.85%
• 5Y*: -34.00%
• 10Y*: -18.08%
• ALL TIME*: -6.40%

FNGU

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -5.11%
• 6M: 29.10%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 1Y: 11.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMF vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	-11.93%	-4.80%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	10.29%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TMF and FNGU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

TMF vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMF

TMF Risk / Return Rank: 7
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 15
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMF vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMF	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	0.17	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.69	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.08	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	0.19	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	0.42	-1.00

TMF vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMF Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMF and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMF vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMF	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.89%	-61.30%	-31.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.51%	-59.55%	+33.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.71%	-22.93%	-69.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.98%	-22.44%	-21.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.32%	26.14%	-12.82%

Volatility

TMF vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 7.32%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 18.17%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMF	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.32%	18.17%	-10.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.81%	53.37%	-33.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.58%	64.82%	-37.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.37%	79.79%	-33.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.72%	79.79%	-36.07%

TMF vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMF vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	4.48%	4.06%	4.29%	2.82%	1.62%	0.13%	2.23%	0.94%	1.49%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMF and FNGU in my portfolio?

TMF and FNGU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMF or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (18.17%) compared to TMF (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, TMF or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, FNGU leads with 11.04% vs -7.67% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMF or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, FNGU has performed better with a 11.04% return vs -7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMF or FNGU?

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMF or FNGU?

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between TMF and FNGU?

TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FNGU is Leveraged Equities. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.