FNGU vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
FNGU and BULZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. Both FNGU and BULZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGU or BULZ.
Key characteristics
| FNGU | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 28.79% | 6.24% |
| 1Y Return | 229.31% | 193.57% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.10 | 2.82 |
| Daily Std Dev | 70.07% | 65.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.34% | -94.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -38.45% | -67.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGU and BULZ is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNGU vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 28.79% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's 6.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGU vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNGU and BULZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGU vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNGU vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNGU nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FNGU vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and BULZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNGU vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 23.69% compared to MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) at 22.06%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.