PortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. FNGG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and FNGG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FNGU vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FNGU:

11.40%

FNGG:

40.65%

Max Drawdown

FNGU:

-1.15%

FNGG:

-3.08%

Current Drawdown

FNGU:

-0.53%

FNGG:

-3.08%

Returns By Period


FNGU

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGU vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.98% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGU vs. FNGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGG is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGG is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGG is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGG is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGG is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGU vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FNGU vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGU nor FNGG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -1.15%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -3.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and FNGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FNGU vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...