PortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. FNGD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and FNGD is -0.79. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FNGU vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNGU:

0.25

FNGD:

-0.80

Sortino Ratio

FNGU:

0.92

FNGD:

-1.24

Omega Ratio

FNGU:

1.12

FNGD:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

FNGU:

0.28

FNGD:

-0.74

Martin Ratio

FNGU:

0.64

FNGD:

-1.54

Ulcer Index

FNGU:

27.62%

FNGD:

47.78%

Daily Std Dev

FNGU:

93.18%

FNGD:

94.42%

Max Drawdown

FNGU:

-92.34%

FNGD:

-99.99%

Current Drawdown

FNGU:

-37.57%

FNGD:

-99.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -25.65% return, which is significantly higher than FNGD's -41.58% return.


FNGU

YTD

-25.65%

1M

-2.11%

6M

-17.22%

1Y

26.49%

3Y*

82.06%

5Y*

41.24%

10Y*

N/A

FNGD

YTD

-41.58%

1M

-23.34%

6M

-49.97%

1Y

-75.54%

3Y*

-76.53%

5Y*

-73.28%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGU vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGU and FNGD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGU vs. FNGD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGD is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGD is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGD is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGD is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGD is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGD is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGU vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the FNGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and FNGD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FNGU vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGU nor FNGD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, smaller than the maximum FNGD drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and FNGD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FNGU vs. FNGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) is 10.08%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a volatility of 19.15%. This indicates that FNGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...