PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FNGU vs. FNGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FNGUFNGO
Sharpe Ratio2.122.08
Sortino Ratio2.422.46
Omega Ratio1.321.33
Calmar Ratio2.472.98
Martin Ratio8.758.78
Ulcer Index17.36%11.37%
Daily Std Dev71.64%47.98%
Max Drawdown-92.34%-78.39%
Current Drawdown-9.21%-2.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and FNGO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

FNGU vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
654.83%
710.14%
FNGU
FNGO

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 118.13% return, which is significantly higher than FNGO's 80.64% return.


FNGU

YTD

118.13%

1M

8.09%

6M

48.09%

1Y

153.96%

5Y (annualized)

60.12%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

FNGO

YTD

80.64%

1M

6.43%

6M

34.65%

1Y

100.98%

5Y (annualized)

54.48%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGU vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGU and FNGO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for FNGU: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FNGO: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGU vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.122.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.422.46
The chart of Omega ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.472.98
The chart of Martin ratio for FNGU, currently valued at 8.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.758.78
FNGU
FNGO

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and FNGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.12
2.08
FNGU
FNGO

Dividends

FNGU vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGU nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -92.34%, which is greater than FNGO's maximum drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and FNGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.21%
-2.75%
FNGU
FNGO

Volatility

FNGU vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) at 13.24%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
20.42%
13.24%
FNGU
FNGO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab