TINS vs. BLST

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.

Performance

TINS vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.46% return.

TINS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: 10.01%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLST

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINS vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	12.57%	3.11%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.46%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TINS and BLST is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

TINS vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 52
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINS vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINS	BLST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.96	—

Drawdowns

TINS vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and BLST.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINS	BLST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.79%	-1.69%	-9.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.55%	-0.70%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-0.38%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TINS	BLST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.61%	2.25%	+15.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	2.27%	+15.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.61%	2.27%	+15.34%

TINS vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINS vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than BLST's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.71%	2.11%
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	0.21%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINS and BLST in my portfolio?

TINS and BLST have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TINS or BLST?

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINS or BLST?

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINS or BLST?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.

What is the main difference between TINS and BLST?

TINS is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.23% for BLST.