BLST vs. BBSB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) and BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte, while BBSB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLST charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBSB.

Performance

BLST vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than BBSB's 0.47% return.

BLST

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBSB

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 3.43%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.25%	2.88%
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	0.47%	2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and BBSB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.85

BLST vs. BBSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLST	BBSB
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	99.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BLST vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSB

BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 85
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLST vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLST	BBSB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	2.35	-0.85

Drawdowns

BLST vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than BBSB's maximum drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and BBSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLST	BBSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-1.57%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.25%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-0.31%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLST	BBSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21%	1.27%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.21%	1.66%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.21%	1.66%	+0.55%

BLST vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLST vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than BBSB's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	3.81%	3.69%	4.84%	3.50%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.38%	2.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLST and BBSB in my portfolio?

BLST and BBSB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLST or BBSB?

On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLST or BBSB?

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLST or BBSB?

BBSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.

What is the main difference between BLST and BBSB?

BLST is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBSB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.04% for BBSB.