TINS vs. POW
TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
TINS vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 22.51% return.
TINS
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -20.54%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.43M | $2.30M | $3.15M | |
| $1.04K | $769.30 | $2.04K |
TINS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 11.09% | 2.18% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 22.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINS and POW is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINS | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -28.02% | +17.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -28.02% | +24.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -5.33% | +3.11% |
Volatility
TINS vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINS | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 33.78% | -16.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 33.78% | -16.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 33.78% | -16.47% |
TINS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, more than POW's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.16% | 0.19% |
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 0.21% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINS and POW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TINS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
TINS has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.16% for POW.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for TINS and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer