PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINS vs. SCUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINS vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TINS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.76%
6M
10.01%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCUB

1D
0.04%
1M
0.36%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINS vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TINS and SCUB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINS vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TINS vs. SCUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINS vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and SCUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINSSCUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-0.08%

-10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

0.00%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-0.01%

-2.15%

Volatility

TINS vs. SCUB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINSSCUBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

0.79%

+16.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

0.79%

+16.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

0.79%

+16.82%

TINS vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINS vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison

TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than SCUB's 1.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TINS and SCUB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.

SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.30% for SCUB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINS and SCUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer