BLST vs. BLUC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) and BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte, while BLUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. Over the past year, BLST returned 3.24% vs 21.74% for BLUC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.23% expense ratio.

Performance

BLST vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than BLUC's 6.76% return.

BLST

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUC

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 5.79%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.35%	2.68%
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	6.76%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and BLUC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

BLST vs. BLUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 44
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BLUC

BLUC Risk / Return Rank: 49
BLUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BLUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BLUC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BLUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BLUC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLST vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLST	BLUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.61	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.21	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.04	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	8.39	-2.51

BLST vs. BLUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLST Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the BLUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLST and BLUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLST vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum BLUC drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and BLUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLST	BLUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-10.69%	+9.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-10.69%	+9.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-4.56%	+3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-1.61%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	2.60%	-2.05%

Volatility

BLST vs. BLUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) is 0.73%, while Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that BLST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLST	BLUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	5.38%	-4.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	10.88%	-9.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25%	13.58%	-11.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.25%	13.58%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.25%	13.58%	-11.33%

BLST vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLST and BLUC have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLST vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than BLUC's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.38%	2.11%
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	0.52%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLST and BLUC in my portfolio?

BLST and BLUC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLST or BLUC?

BLUC has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to BLST (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLST dropped -1.69% vs BLUC's -10.69%.

Which ETF is better, BLST or BLUC?

On 1-year performance, BLUC leads with 21.74% vs 3.24% for BLST. Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. On volatility, BLST has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLST or BLUC?

Over the 1-year period, BLUC has performed better with a 21.74% return vs 3.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLST or BLUC?

BLST and BLUC have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLST or BLUC?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.52% for BLUC.

What is the main difference between BLST and BLUC?

BLST is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BLUC is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.