PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLST vs. BLUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLST vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than BLUC's 10.25% return.


BLST

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
0.25%2.88%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
10.25%14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and BLUC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.28

BLST vs. BLUC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLST
BLUC

Financial Services

100.0%
9.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.5%

Communication Services

-

12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.0%

Energy

-

2.7%

Healthcare

-

7.7%

Industrials

-

7.3%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Technology

-

40.6%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Financial Services

BLST
100.0%
BLUC
9.8%

Basic Materials

BLST

-

BLUC
1.5%

Communication Services

BLST

-

BLUC
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BLST

-

BLUC
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

BLST

-

BLUC
4.0%

Energy

BLST

-

BLUC
2.7%

Healthcare

BLST

-

BLUC
7.7%

Industrials

BLST

-

BLUC
7.3%

Real Estate

BLST

-

BLUC
1.6%

Technology

BLST

-

BLUC
40.6%

Utilities

BLST

-

BLUC
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLST vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST vs. BLUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLSTBLUCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

2.11

-0.61

Drawdowns

BLST vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum BLUC drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and BLUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSTBLUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-10.69%

+9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.43%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-1.52%

+1.17%

Volatility

BLST vs. BLUC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSTBLUCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

13.00%

-10.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

13.00%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

13.00%

-10.79%

BLST vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLST and BLUC have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLST vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than BLUC's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
3.38%2.11%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
0.51%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLST and BLUC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLST and BLUC have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.

BLST is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BLUC is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLST and BLUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer