TINS vs. SCSB
TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SCSB.
Performance
TINS vs. SCSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TINS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCSB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINS vs. SCSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 12.99% |
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINS and SCSB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINS vs. SCSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINS vs. SCSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than SCSB's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and SCSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINS | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -0.46% | -10.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -0.03% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -0.09% | -2.07% |
Volatility
TINS vs. SCSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINS | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 1.46% | +16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 1.46% | +16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 1.46% | +16.15% |
TINS vs. SCSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCSB's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINS vs. SCSB - Dividend Comparison
TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than SCSB's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.62% | 0.00% |
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 0.21% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINS and SCSB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.
SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.33% for SCSB.
Find the right allocation for TINS and SCSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer