BLST vs. BINT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) and BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while BINT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLST returned 2.19% vs 27.14% for BINT. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.23% expense ratio.

Performance

BLST vs. BINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BINT's 13.19% return.

BLST

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: -0.11%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 1Y: 2.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.56%

BINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 13.19%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	$953.50K	$992.98K	$1.76M
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	$264.65K	$283.89K	$412.69K

BLST vs. BINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.15%	2.68%
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	13.19%	14.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and BINT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

BLST vs. BINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 48
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 71
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLST vs. BINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLST	BINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.64	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.28	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.30	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	2.44	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	9.45	-4.82

BLST vs. BINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLST Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the BINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLST and BINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLST vs. BINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum BINT drawdown of -10.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and BINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLST	BINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-10.94%	+9.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-10.94%	+9.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-3.12%	+2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-1.65%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	2.82%	-2.21%

Volatility

BLST vs. BINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) is 0.64%, while Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that BLST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLST	BINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	5.19%	-4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.79%	14.44%	-12.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24%	16.31%	-14.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.25%	15.84%	-13.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.25%	15.84%	-13.59%

BLST vs. BINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLST and BINT have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLST vs. BINT - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than BINT's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.76%	1.08%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.79%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLST and BINT in my portfolio?

BLST and BINT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLST or BINT?

BINT has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to BLST (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLST dropped -1.69% vs BINT's -10.94%.

Which ETF is better, BLST or BINT?

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 27.14% vs 2.19% for BLST. Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. On volatility, BLST has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLST or BINT?

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 27.14% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLST or BINT?

BLST and BINT have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLST or BINT?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.76% for BINT.

What is the main difference between BLST and BINT?

BLST is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BINT is Global Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.