TINS vs. BINT

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, while BINT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BINT.

Performance

TINS vs. BINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than BINT's 10.07% return.

TINS

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 3.63%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BINT

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -3.64%
• 6M: 3.89%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 1Y: 21.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	$969.85K	$1.17M	$1.77M
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	$1.04K	$769.30	$2.04K

TINS vs. BINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	11.09%	3.11%
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	10.07%	3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TINS and BINT is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

TINS vs. BINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TINS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 60
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TINS vs. BINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINS	BINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.59	—

Drawdowns

TINS vs. BINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, roughly equal to the maximum BINT drawdown of -10.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and BINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINS	BINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.79%	-10.94%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.82%	-5.79%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-1.64%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TINS	BINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	16.10%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	15.68%	+1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	15.68%	+1.63%

TINS vs. BINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BINT's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINS vs. BINT - Dividend Comparison

TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than BINT's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.81%	1.08%
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	0.21%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINS and BINT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, TINS and BINT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TINS or BINT?

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINS or BINT?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINS or BINT?

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.

What is the main difference between TINS and BINT?

TINS is categorized as Actively Managed, while BINT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.23% for BINT.